I see an argument unsupported by evidence, and without evidence it
approaches baseless and without value.
Please go and write an essay about the matter at
https://wikisource.org/ referencing the original argument for the
split, and how the reintroduction of a single site would be of value,
and how it might be done. In fact how it will be better than now.
Otherwise all I see is a doom and gloom worry-wort.
Regards, Billinghurst
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 2:03 AM, Alex Brollo <alex.brollo(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm deeply convinced that splitting wikisource
projects into variuos
languages has been a mistake.
Is anyone so bold to imagine that it is possible to revert that mistake?
Or, are we forced to travel along the diabolicum trail?
Alex
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l