Please don't underestimate the critical point of editing interface and editing tools (even if *small*...), proofreading is the core of wikisource work and it is presently the bottle neck - any minor success about proofreading comfort, speed & precision is highly valuable and really effective.
Alex
2016-11-16 13:29 GMT+01:00 David Cuenca Tudela dacuetu@gmail.com:
I like the idea of finishing the development of BookManager2, it is a pity that the code was not reviewed https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:BookManagerv2
Cheers, Micru
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Andrea Zanni zanni.andrea84@gmail.com wrote:
I made a draft on a proposal here: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2016_Community_Wishlist_Surv ey/Categories/Wikisource#Make_Wikisource_.22book-based.22
Please edit, it's a draft and I think it's a problem many of us know from a long time.
The idea is that, if we had a system for MediaWiki to know what a book is, we could
- better metadata management system, thus a better integration with
Wikidata
- we could develop better tools, for example create automatic Indexes and
navigation templates, which would maybe enable us to "import" EPUBs directly on Wikisource
- have a better workflow, making it easier to new users to use us
- have even better statistics and analytics: which are the *books* (not
the pages!) which are read o WIkisource?
etc.
IMHO, the Community Wishlist is a great opportunity to push for a systemic development of Wikisource: I'm convinced we don't need little tools here and there, but a systematic overview of what Wikisource framework, workflows and software. I'm open to discuss the merging of different proposals in the Wishlist.
Aubrey
Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
-- Etiamsi omnes, ego non
Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l