Please don't underestimate the critical point of editing interface and editing tools (even if small...), proofreading is the core of wikisource work and it is presently the bottle neck - any minor success about proofreading comfort, speed & precision is highly valuable and really effective. 


Alex


2016-11-16 13:29 GMT+01:00 David Cuenca Tudela <dacuetu@gmail.com>:
I like the idea of finishing the development of BookManager2, it is a pity that the code was not reviewed
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:BookManagerv2

Cheers,
Micru

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Andrea Zanni <zanni.andrea84@gmail.com> wrote:
Please edit, it's a draft and I think it's a problem many of us know from a long time.

The idea is that, if we had a system for MediaWiki to know what a book is,
we could
* better metadata management system, thus a better integration with Wikidata
* we could develop better tools, for example create automatic Indexes and navigation templates, which would maybe enable us to "import" EPUBs directly on Wikisource
* have a better workflow, making it easier to new users to use us
* have even better statistics and analytics: which are the *books* (not the pages!) which are read o WIkisource?

etc.

IMHO, the Community Wishlist is a great opportunity to push for a systemic development of Wikisource: I'm convinced we don't need little tools here and there, but a systematic overview of what Wikisource framework, workflows and software.
I'm open to discuss the merging of different proposals in the Wishlist.

Aubrey


_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l




--
Etiamsi omnes, ego non

_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l