> Micru and me have decided that it's better hide works until 24th, because
> now somebody can proofread pages offline and 24th upload it all pages. It
> is not fair! I like your score table.
I hadn't thought of that, but it's too late now.
To be honest, I'm more worried about no one noticing or taking part. I'm
not sure how to advertise the contest outside of English Wikisource.
- Adam
> Hi Adam, could you please give us some details about
> Speciale:RecentChangesLinked?
> Could you make some examples for all?
It's the "Related changes" link in the side bar in English ("Modifiche
correlate", "Seguiment d'enllaços", "Änderungen an verlinkten Seiten"
etc).
It's like the "Recent Changes" page but limited to pages linked to the
current page. If you use it on an Index page it will show all the
edits in the Page namespace because they are linked through the
<pagelist />.
For example, if you had "Index:Foo", the page
"Special:RecentChangesLinked/Index:Foo" would show all changes in the
index page, all changes in the page namespace and anything else linked
to it. If you set the namespace parameter to "Page", it will just
show the Page namespace changes. That should show all proofreading
activity tied to a particular scan.
If you look at this page:
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Special:RecentChangesLinked/Index:Foggerty.dj…
You will see the edits I've made to get the index ready (including in
the main namespace and the author page).
This version (with just the Page namespace selected), shows just my
proofreading: http://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?namespace=104&tagfilter=&target=Index%…
I intend to check this page for each of the ten indices we've chosen.
It might need a little more investigation sometimes, but I think it
will work.
If there were more time, I think a bot could be coded to do this
automatically. However, there are only a few days left and I don't
know how to do it myself.
- Adam
OK, I've put together a rough page for the English Wikisource. It should
all be ready to go on the 24th.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Tenth_Anniversary_Contest
I'm not sure how anyone else is doing this but we've selected ten texts and
this is going to work a lot like our Proofread of the Month project. I
will use Special:RecentChangesLinked to track edits on each of the ten.
Any thoughts or criticism?
- Adam
Hi Craig,
Your message had many interesting insights and I thank you for them. You
are right that the contest seems a bit haphazard in its goals, but
considering that it is the first attempt at something like it, and given
the little time that we have (and as Aubrey said, few volunteers to run
it), just to run *anything* it is already a challenge by itself. Yes, the
main goal is to cellebrate the anniversary, and proofread, and give and
have an extra incentive.
As for the prize I must say that it is well-suited for the small community
size of the Catalan group (about 6 very active contributors, plus some
coming and going), but for larger communities I can imagine that they would
be happier to have better prices (high-end tablets and good scanners are in
big demand too) or more quantity. The voucher idea is indeed very
interesting too (even if it is delivered at random in addition to the
regular price), I will ask to see if we have enough budget to add it to our
version.
About the outreach, well, I think the first thing to do is to show
ourselves that we can run a contest :) I don't know about other communities
but for us it is the first time and we need also to build the confidence
and the experience. If we can make it work, next year we could try again
with partnerships and to be more ambitious with the goals.
Anyhow, I really appreciate the effort put into this.
Cheers
David --Micru
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Craig Franklin <
craig.franklin(a)wikimedia.org.au> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> A couple of thoughts on this, based on Kerry Raymond's earlier post to the
> WMAU list:-
>
> 1. What is the purpose of this competition, other than to celebrate the
> 10th anniversary? Is it to attract new users? Is it to get some key works
> transcribed very quickly? Is it to distribute movement-funded prizes to
> long-term contributors? The purpose of the competition will drive how it
> is structured.
>
> 2. As has been pointed out, an e-Reader, at least in Australia (and
> probably most other developed English speaking countries) is not all that
> impressive a prize, especially if you already have one or don't have an
> interest in having an e-Reader. I think a slightly better prize would be a
> gift certificate to somewhere like Amazon or Fishpond, so at least the
> winner can choose something they know they'll like. This may be different
> in other countries, of course.
>
> 3. A point-based system like what you propose is easy enough to
> administer, but if the approach is to attract new users, they'll probably
> notice that anyone that doesn't get in within the first couple of days is
> probably at a massive disadvantage to getting the prize. In turn, this
> will make the motivational aspect of the prize disappear for anyone that
> comes late. If we're counting on the prize to get users to do some work, I
> think we'd be disappointed. This can be solved a bit by having a prize
> pool that can be broken into smaller pieces, so rather than a $100 e-Reader
> you can distribute a $20 voucher every day (for example). This would mean
> that those who arrive late still have a chance of getting something.
>
> 4. My experience with running competitions like this is that if you
> approach it with a "build it and they will come" mindset, the only entrants
> you'll get are people who are already contributing in that fashion anyway.
> There needs to be some hook to get people who have not previously heard of
> or contributed to Wikisource to contribute. Otherwise they're never going
> to hear about it and we're never going to get our new users. Is there some
> mechanism to advertise this widely beyond just existing Wikisource users?
>
> 5. WMAU's experience with the "Pitch In!" project, where we did have the
> support of a major public institution as a hook to get those new users in,
> is that it's actually quite hard to get new users to Wikisource to 'stick'.
> I think we can expect a lot of users to do a single page, and a lot of new
> users to vanish once the contest is over. If recruitment is the goal, then
> there needs to be a strategy to continue engaging with users who arrive for
> the competition so that we retain them.
>
> I don't want to be the one that pours cold water on the whole idea (I do
> think it'd be wonderful to do *something* for the 10th anniversary), but
> I'm not clear on what we're actually trying to achieve with this
> competition.
>
> Cheers,
> Craig Franklin
>
>
>
>
> On 7 November 2013 09:40, David Cuenca <dacuetu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Since this is the first time we do it and we don't have enough
>> organizational capacity, it will be easier to hold independent contests.
>>
>> For the Catalan edition we are planning to do as follows:
>> - the contest will be open from Nov 24th 00 UTC till Dec 1st 23:59 UTC.
>> - 2 organizers select 3 books in secret (more will be added if needed).
>> The books have OCR of acceptable quality and they are not too hard to
>> format. The books chosen will be disclosed when the contest begins. One
>> sample page will be offered, plus links to relevant help pages. We are
>> putting it all together here:
>> https://ca.wikisource.org/wiki/Viquitexts:Viquirepte_10%C3%A8_aniversari
>> - the participants get 3 points for each completely corrected and
>> formatted page, if they validate someone else's page, they get 1 point
>> - the organizers can disqualify a participant if they mark pages as done
>> without actually working on them
>> - the prize will be an ebook reader (model TBD)
>>
>> KRLS has told me that he will try to have a counting script ready, if
>> not, we will count it manually.
>>
>> So how many contests are we going to have? Italian, Catalan and, maybe
>> WM-DC or WM-AU organize the English version?
>>
>> When everything is clear we should prepare an annoncement and publish it
>> next week on the Wikimedia blog.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Micru
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Andrea Zanni <zanni.andrea84(a)gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Regarding the cotest:
>>> how do you like an international contest, with both local wikisource and
>>> single user chart?
>>>
>>> Something like Wiki Loves Monuments, like this:
>>> https://toolserver.org/~emijrp/wlm/stats.php
>>>
>>> The real problem is that we *don't* have a way (right now), to associate
>>> clearly proofredings and validation with single users.
>>> I don't know how phe's tools count them, but I'm sure something could be
>>> done.
>>> toolserver.org/~phe/statistics.php?diff=1
>>>
>>> Aubrey
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Craig Franklin <
>>> cfranklin(a)halonetwork.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Well, that would be well within the realm of what the WMAU "Volunteer
>>>> Support Programme" would be able to fund, if one of our members were to
>>>> apply:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.wikimedia.org.au//wiki/Volunteer_Support_Programme
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4 November 2013 22:18, Andrea Zanni <zanni.andrea84(a)gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Well, I'd be 100 dollars/euros, something low budget (like a Kindle or
>>>>> a Kobo).
>>>>>
>>>>> Aubrey
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Craig Franklin <
>>>>> cfranklin(a)halonetwork.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What sort of cost are we looking at to buy some nifty gadget as a
>>>>>> prize? Is it something that could be done through our Volunteer Support
>>>>>> Programme?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Craig Franklin
>>>>>> President - Wikimedia Australia
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1 November 2013 16:55, John Vandenberg <jayvdb(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Great concept.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think this would a great little project, and worth the expense for
>>>>>>> the WMAu chapter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I helped run a small wikisource competition with Wikimedia Indonesia
>>>>>>> (esp. Ivonne & Siska) to transcribe a 550 page dictionary, and found it to
>>>>>>> be very successful, but does require quite a bit of time to run and help
>>>>>>> newbies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ill write up a proposal if another WMAu member is willing to second
>>>>>>> and help organise the competition in Oz.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>>> From: "David Cuenca" <dacuetu(a)gmail.com>
>>>>>>> Date: Oct 31, 2013 10:09 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: [Wikisource-l] Wikisource 10th aniversary proposal :
>>>>>>> Proofreading contest
>>>>>>> To: "discussion list for Wikisource, the free library" <
>>>>>>> wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
>>>>>>> Cc:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Talking with some members of Amical Wikimedia about how to celebrate
>>>>>>> the 10th aniversary, one of the proposals was to organize a proofreading
>>>>>>> contest.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Basically, we would select some books for the participants to
>>>>>>> proofread and validate and they would gather points for each page without
>>>>>>> errors. The person with the most points would win a Kindle donated by
>>>>>>> Amical Wikimedia.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, we have been thinking that with the help of some members of
>>>>>>> the Wikisource User Group and other Chapters, then we could escalate it to
>>>>>>> an international proofreading contest, instead of being just regional. I
>>>>>>> guess ideally we would need 3 kindles and at least a volunteer from each
>>>>>>> community to organize it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What do you think of the idea? Would you or any chapter that would
>>>>>>> like to get involved?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Micru
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Wikisource-l mailing list
>>>>>>> Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Wikisource-l mailing list
>>>>>>> Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Wikisource-l mailing list
>>>>>> Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikisource-l mailing list
>>> Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Etiamsi omnes, ego non
>>
>
>
--
Etiamsi omnes, ego non
==Summary==
Please provide some input on the programme for the upcoming Wikimedia
Conference. What topics would you like to see addressed? What would be
useful for your group and community?
==Details==
I am part of the programme team [1] for next year's Wikimedia Conference
[2] (April 2014 (exact dates to be announced), in Berlin, Germany) and at
the moment we are collecting relevant input from all chapters and other
affiliates. Our aim is to ensure that all voices are heard in the content
design phase and that all important topics being discussed in the movement
become visible.
We are collecting burning questions and hot topics [3], as well as feedback
regarding the programme of previous conferences [4]. After that, the
programme team will collectively cluster and prioritze those topics,
supported by our facilitator Anna Lena Schiller. In January, we will then
start designing an agenda based on content input from all stakeholders
while considering previous experiences/evaluations/feedback.
I would be glad if you and your community could add your thoughts and
ideas, too! Please provide your hot topics, if possible before November
23rd, and help us come up with a diverse and efficient programme, leading
to useful outcomes. You can send your input either via email, or if you
prefer, you can directly add to the Meta page[3].
Our questions for you:
Most important:
* What are your hot topics and burning questions?
Nice to have:
* What did we do that we should continue doing?
* What did we do that we should do more of?
* What did we do that we should continue doing?
* What did we do that we should do more of?
* What did we do that we should do less of?
* What did we do that we should stop doing?
* What didn't we do that we should start doing?
Should you have any questions, feel free to get in touch. You can also
reach out to the whole programme team via the Meta talk page.
Thanks a lot and best regards,
Asaf
P.S.: The event management team at Wikimedia Deutschland (our hosts) is
finalising the contract with the venue and we hope to be able to announce
the final dates by the end of next week. It will most probably be 10-13
April. We will open the registration after prioritising the topics, to give
all affiliations the chance to send the representatives whom they think can
best cover and discuss these topics.
[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2014/Programme_team
[2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2014
[3]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2014/Programme#What_ar…
[4]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Conference_2014/Programme#Review_…
--
Asaf Bartov
Wikimedia Foundation <http://www.wikimediafoundation.org>
Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the
sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
https://donate.wikimedia.org
Quantitative feedback for Wsexport un October: http://wsexport.wmflabs.org/tool/stat.php?month=10&year=2013
Le 13 nov. 2013 10:59, "Federico Leva (Nemo)" <nemowiki(a)gmail.com> a écrit :
Erik Moeller, 13/11/2013 06:51:
> We're re-implementing the rendering pipeline for Collections to ensure
> long-term maintainability, and our default would be to eliminate
> initially all formats except for PDF if we don't absolutely have to
> support them. I'll see if we can get some metrics on current ZIM file
> usage via the Collection extension, but it'd be nice to get
> qualitative feedback as well.
>
> (More background at: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/PDF_rendering )
All including ePub (cc Wikisource-l).
Nemo
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
Erik Moeller, 13/11/2013 06:51:
> We're re-implementing the rendering pipeline for Collections to ensure
> long-term maintainability, and our default would be to eliminate
> initially all formats except for PDF if we don't absolutely have to
> support them. I'll see if we can get some metrics on current ZIM file
> usage via the Collection extension, but it'd be nice to get
> qualitative feedback as well.
>
> (More background at: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/PDF_rendering )
All including ePub (cc Wikisource-l).
Nemo
Hi all.
I would like to raise the issue that this mailing list *seems* not to have
active administrators/moderators.
As per suggestion of Asaf, I asked zhaladsar (who seems to be the only
admiin) several times (in these months) to be co-administrator. He never
replied.
Also, some users seem to have problems too (es
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Aubrey#Wikisource_User_Group)
How can we solve this?
I'd like to be an admin of the list, I don't know
* if you are OK with it
* how to do this (maybe a bug in bugzilla?)
Aubrey
> Hi David,
>
> A couple of thoughts on this, based on Kerry Raymond's earlier post to the
> WMAU list:-
>
> 1. What is the purpose of this competition, other than to celebrate the
> 10th anniversary? Is it to attract new users? Is it to get some key works
> transcribed very quickly? Is it to distribute movement-funded prizes to
> long-term contributors? The purpose of the competition will drive how it
> is structured.
>
> 2. As has been pointed out, an e-Reader, at least in Australia (and
> probably most other developed English speaking countries) is not all that
> impressive a prize, especially if you already have one or don't have an
> interest in having an e-Reader. I think a slightly better prize would be a
> gift certificate to somewhere like Amazon or Fishpond, so at least the
> winner can choose something they know they'll like. This may be different
> in other countries, of course.
>
> 3. A point-based system like what you propose is easy enough to
> administer, but if the approach is to attract new users, they'll probably
> notice that anyone that doesn't get in within the first couple of days is
> probably at a massive disadvantage to getting the prize. In turn, this
> will make the motivational aspect of the prize disappear for anyone that
> comes late. If we're counting on the prize to get users to do some work, I
> think we'd be disappointed. This can be solved a bit by having a prize
> pool that can be broken into smaller pieces, so rather than a $100 e-Reader
> you can distribute a $20 voucher every day (for example). This would mean
> that those who arrive late still have a chance of getting something.
>
> 4. My experience with running competitions like this is that if you
> approach it with a "build it and they will come" mindset, the only entrants
> you'll get are people who are already contributing in that fashion anyway.
> There needs to be some hook to get people who have not previously heard of
> or contributed to Wikisource to contribute. Otherwise they're never going
> to hear about it and we're never going to get our new users. Is there some
> mechanism to advertise this widely beyond just existing Wikisource users?
>
> 5. WMAU's experience with the "Pitch In!" project, where we did have the
> support of a major public institution as a hook to get those new users in,
> is that it's actually quite hard to get new users to Wikisource to 'stick'.
> I think we can expect a lot of users to do a single page, and a lot of new
> users to vanish once the contest is over. If recruitment is the goal, then
> there needs to be a strategy to continue engaging with users who arrive for
> the competition so that we retain them.
>
> I don't want to be the one that pours cold water on the whole idea (I do
> think it'd be wonderful to do *something* for the 10th anniversary), but
> I'm not clear on what we're actually trying to achieve with this
> competition.
>
> Cheers,
> Craig Franklin
>
>
Hi Craig,
thanks for the suggestions.
Our idea is that, right now, every community can organize the constest as
it will. The main problem is that there is one interested user for
community, in this ml :-), so it is hard enough to make the contest
happen, let alone make a very good and succesful one.
In this regard, I'm more perfect is the enemy of the good: our people
resource are scarce, so if there is a little contest with a little prize,
I'm happy :-)
Your points, especially 3 and 4, are really good insights and I'll take
them in the Italian Village Pump.
I would say that the sitenotice is a good place to promote and advertise
the contest.
It.wikisource also has a "window" on the Wikipedia main page, and we can
put it there too. Moreover, we have access to
Facebook and Twitter wikimedia pages, so we can boost it on those.
If someone of you is willing to write a blogpost in the Wikimedia blog,
both for the Wikisource Community User Group and the Wikisource contest, is
welcome to :-)
Aubrey
>
>
>
> On 7 November 2013 09:40, David Cuenca <dacuetu(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Since this is the first time we do it and we don't have enough
>> organizational capacity, it will be easier to hold independent contests.
>>
>> For the Catalan edition we are planning to do as follows:
>> - the contest will be open from Nov 24th 00 UTC till Dec 1st 23:59 UTC.
>> - 2 organizers select 3 books in secret (more will be added if needed).
>> The books have OCR of acceptable quality and they are not too hard to
>> format. The books chosen will be disclosed when the contest begins. One
>> sample page will be offered, plus links to relevant help pages. We are
>> putting it all together here:
>> https://ca.wikisource.org/wiki/Viquitexts:Viquirepte_10%C3%A8_aniversari
>> - the participants get 3 points for each completely corrected and
>> formatted page, if they validate someone else's page, they get 1 point
>> - the organizers can disqualify a participant if they mark pages as done
>> without actually working on them
>> - the prize will be an ebook reader (model TBD)
>>
>> KRLS has told me that he will try to have a counting script ready, if
>> not, we will count it manually.
>>
>> So how many contests are we going to have? Italian, Catalan and, maybe
>> WM-DC or WM-AU organize the English version?
>>
>> When everything is clear we should prepare an annoncement and publish it
>> next week on the Wikimedia blog.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Micru
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Andrea Zanni <zanni.andrea84(a)gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Regarding the cotest:
>>> how do you like an international contest, with both local wikisource and
>>> single user chart?
>>>
>>> Something like Wiki Loves Monuments, like this:
>>> https://toolserver.org/~emijrp/wlm/stats.php
>>>
>>> The real problem is that we *don't* have a way (right now), to associate
>>> clearly proofredings and validation with single users.
>>> I don't know how phe's tools count them, but I'm sure something could be
>>> done.
>>> toolserver.org/~phe/statistics.php?diff=1
>>>
>>> Aubrey
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Craig Franklin <
>>> cfranklin(a)halonetwork.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Well, that would be well within the realm of what the WMAU "Volunteer
>>>> Support Programme" would be able to fund, if one of our members were to
>>>> apply:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.wikimedia.org.au//wiki/Volunteer_Support_Programme
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4 November 2013 22:18, Andrea Zanni <zanni.andrea84(a)gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Well, I'd be 100 dollars/euros, something low budget (like a Kindle or
>>>>> a Kobo).
>>>>>
>>>>> Aubrey
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Craig Franklin <
>>>>> cfranklin(a)halonetwork.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi John,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What sort of cost are we looking at to buy some nifty gadget as a
>>>>>> prize? Is it something that could be done through our Volunteer Support
>>>>>> Programme?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Craig Franklin
>>>>>> President - Wikimedia Australia
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1 November 2013 16:55, John Vandenberg <jayvdb(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Great concept.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think this would a great little project, and worth the expense for
>>>>>>> the WMAu chapter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I helped run a small wikisource competition with Wikimedia Indonesia
>>>>>>> (esp. Ivonne & Siska) to transcribe a 550 page dictionary, and found it to
>>>>>>> be very successful, but does require quite a bit of time to run and help
>>>>>>> newbies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ill write up a proposal if another WMAu member is willing to second
>>>>>>> and help organise the competition in Oz.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>>> From: "David Cuenca" <dacuetu(a)gmail.com>
>>>>>>> Date: Oct 31, 2013 10:09 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: [Wikisource-l] Wikisource 10th aniversary proposal :
>>>>>>> Proofreading contest
>>>>>>> To: "discussion list for Wikisource, the free library" <
>>>>>>> wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
>>>>>>> Cc:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Talking with some members of Amical Wikimedia about how to celebrate
>>>>>>> the 10th aniversary, one of the proposals was to organize a proofreading
>>>>>>> contest.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Basically, we would select some books for the participants to
>>>>>>> proofread and validate and they would gather points for each page without
>>>>>>> errors. The person with the most points would win a Kindle donated by
>>>>>>> Amical Wikimedia.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, we have been thinking that with the help of some members of
>>>>>>> the Wikisource User Group and other Chapters, then we could escalate it to
>>>>>>> an international proofreading contest, instead of being just regional. I
>>>>>>> guess ideally we would need 3 kindles and at least a volunteer from each
>>>>>>> community to organize it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What do you think of the idea? Would you or any chapter that would
>>>>>>> like to get involved?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Micru
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Wikisource-l mailing list
>>>>>>> Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Wikisource-l mailing list
>>>>>>> Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Wikisource-l mailing list
>>>>>> Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikisource-l mailing list
>>> Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Etiamsi omnes, ego non
>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Etiamsi omnes, ego non
>
Talking with some members of Amical Wikimedia about how to celebrate the
10th aniversary, one of the proposals was to organize a proofreading
contest.
Basically, we would select some books for the participants to proofread and
validate and they would gather points for each page without errors. The
person with the most points would win a Kindle donated by Amical Wikimedia.
However, we have been thinking that with the help of some members of the
Wikisource User Group and other Chapters, then we could escalate it to an
international proofreading contest, instead of being just regional. I guess
ideally we would need 3 kindles and at least a volunteer from each
community to organize it.
What do you think of the idea? Would you or any chapter that would like to
get involved?
Micru