No cronograma eu senti falta de menção ao planejamento estratégico entre
julho de 2009 e julho de 2010, assim como o programa 'Devenvolvimento
Global' (Global Development).
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chapters_Dialogue/Context#Strategy_wik…
A falta de representação nos países do sul no movimento wikimedia, a
resistência à *tentativa* brasileira um pouco diferente do que bem funciona
em alguns países do norte (nem todos, como muitos sabemos), assim como
certas trapalhadas da WMF e dos voluntários são muito importantes para esse
diálogo (me refiro às trapalhadas que pude acompanhar, ou seja, mais no
contexto brasileiro).
Boas discussões e, principalmente, documentações no wiki.
Tom
2014-08-03 21:32 GMT-03:00 Cornelius Kibelka <cornelius.kibelka(a)wikimedia.de
:
> Sinceramente, recomendo-vos não só uma olhada geral, mas mesmo lerem o
> relatório. O mais cómodo é o arquivo pdf, e, se não tiverem tempo, o
> resumo. Os que vão a Londres têm algumas horas livres no avião ;)
>
> O projecto abrange perguntas muito importante que não só tocam "os
> capítulos" ou a Fundação, mas a todos que fazem do movimento Wikimédia. As
> "perguntas fortes" (tough questions) todos nós temos que responder, ou
pelo
> menos tentar encontrar uma resposta.
>
> Se tiverem alguma dúvida, não hesitem em perguntar a Nicole (em inglês) ou
> a mim (obviamente em português).
>
> Abraços,
> Cornelius
> (Aqui em nome de Wikimedia Alemanha)
> Am 04.08.2014 00:42 schrieb "Rodrigo Padula"
<rodrigopadula(a)gmail.com
:
>
> Eu e o Jonas tivemos a oportunidade de conhecer a Kira durante a Iberoconf
>> no México durante a etapa de levantamento de dados e entrevistas.
>>
>> Assistimos também a apresentação do resultado final do projeto em Berlim,
>> foi muito bacana!
>>
>> Recomendo a todos darem uma olhada geral no material.
>>
>> Padula
>>
>>
>> 2014-08-03 9:53 GMT-03:00 Everton Zanella Alvarenga <tom(a)okfn.org.br
:
>>
>>> Boa iniciativa.
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Nicole Ebber <nicole.ebber(a)wikimedia.de>
>>> Date: 2014-08-01 17:28 GMT-03:00
>>> Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Insights of the Chapters Dialogue are online!
>>> To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Wikimedia friends,
>>>
>>> I am happy to announce that we have finally released the documentation
>>> of the Chapters Dialogue project.
>>>
>>> You might probably remember: The Chapters Dialogue was the project
>>> that was initiated by Wikimedia Deutschland in spring 2013, my former
>>> colleague Kira Krämer interviewed representatives from Wikimedia
>>> Chapters, the Wikimedia Foundation as well as Funds Dissemination and
>>> Affiliations Committee. Kira and I presented the insights at several
>>> occasions already, and now the written report is at your disposal.
>>>
>>> Please find all the information on the Meta page:
>>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Chapters_Dialogue
>>>
>>> For those of you who are already on their way into the weekend, to
>>> London, or reading via mobile, I’m copying the Executive Summary of
>>> the findings at the end of this email.
>>>
>>> Luckily, Wikimania is coming and I will be available to answer your
>>> questions and reflect on ideas or concerns with anyone interested.
>>> I’ll be in London from Tuesday till Monday, and will host a session on
>>> the Chapters Dialogue insights on Saturday from 12:15 to 13:00 in room
>>> Auditorium 1[1]. Attendees of this session will witness the premier of
>>> the Chapters Dialogue movie, which will be released to the public
>>> shortly after. If you cannot attend the session and don’t find me
>>> hanging around at the Wikimedia Deutschland booth in the Community
>>> Village, you can reach me via my user page[2] or via email.
>>>
>>> I would like to take this opportunity to again express my sincere
>>> gratitude to everyone who participated, be it as one of the 94
>>> interviewees or one of our mentors, critical friend or supporter in
>>> any other way. It’s been a blast!
>>>
>>> A very special and very warm thank you goes out to Kira. Together, we
>>> rocked this last year and went through most exciting times. Kira is no
>>> longer working for WMDE, but I promised to forward her every comment
>>> and email that we receive from you.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Nicole
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
https://wikimania2014.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions/The_State_of_Wikimedia…
>>> [2]
>>>
https://wikimania2014.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Nicole_Ebber_%28WMDE%29
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Wikimedia Deutschland – Chapters Dialogue
>>> Nicole Ebber (Project Lead), Kira Krämer (Project Manager)
>>>
>>> Executive Summary
>>> Wikimedia is a global movement: the Wikimedia Foundation, the
>>> Wikimedia Chapters and the international communities work and fight
>>> for Free Knowledge. In spring 2013, Wikimedia Deutschland initiated a
>>> structured assessment of the movement organisations’ needs, goals and
>>> stories: the Chapters Dialogue. Nicole Ebber led the project and hired
>>> Kira Krämer, who adapted the Design Thinking methodology to the
>>> process.
>>>
>>> In the course of the project (August 2013-February 2014), 94 movement
>>> representatives (volunteers and staff) from Chapters, the Wikimedia
>>> Foundation as well as the Funds Dissemination Committee and the
>>> Affiliations Committee were interviewed.
>>>
>>> The interviewees spoke about their understanding of roles and
>>> relationships within the movement, of responsibilities that come with
>>> being a Chapter or being the WMF. They described their goals and
>>> stories, what support they need and who they think is in a position to
>>> offer this support.
>>>
>>> The synthesis of all the interviews resulted in an overall picture of
>>> the movement and a distillate of the most pressing issues. The
>>> findings and insights cover these main areas, which have had a great
>>> influence on the movement as it is today.
>>>
>>> Lack of empathy and the persistence of old narratives: All the
>>> conflicts described in this report are based on causes that are deep
>>> rooted and manifested in people’s perceptions about each other that
>>> still persist today. Each party in the movement has its own needs and
>>> tries to solve issues in its own interests, while lacking empathy for
>>> other views, opinions, contexts and behaviour.
>>>
>>> Measuring success when exploring new territory: The movement lacks a
>>> definition of what impact actually means to it, as all Wikimedia
>>> activities can be described as exploring entirely new territory.
>>> Chapters struggle with proving that they and their activities are
>>> worth invested in while WMF has difficulty providing a clear movement
>>> strategy.
>>>
>>> Organisational structures: Organisational structures have grown
>>> organically without any official recommendation for or analysis of the
>>> best organisational form to achieve impact. The lack of a shared
>>> understanding about the Chapters’ role and contribution to the
>>> movement causes severe insecurities and is fuelling conflicts and
>>> misperceptions.
>>>
>>> Money-driven decisions: Creating a consensus about money, its
>>> collection and responsible dissemination (donors’ trust!) is scarcely
>>> possible. The Haifa trauma persistently blights the relationship
>>> between WMF and the Chapters, fuelled by additional disagreement about
>>> the new fundraising and grantmaking processes.
>>>
>>> The gap in leadership: Who should take the leadership role and what
>>> should leadership in the Wikimedia movement look like? Adopting the
>>> narrowed focus, the WMF clearly states that it does not see the
>>> development of movement entities as their duty. Chapters on the other
>>> hand expect the WMF to take a leading role in Chapters’ development,
>>> while the WMF expects Chapters to be more proactive.
>>>
>>> None of these conflicts can be viewed in isolation, and no solution
>>> can be developed without a thorough understanding and frank
>>> conversations about the causes in the first place. We therefore
>>> consider that it would be highly irresponsible to suggest solutions to
>>> any of the described issues. Instead, we have distilled tough
>>> questions from the insights that need to be addressed urgently and
>>> answered in an open and comprehensive manner:
>>>
>>> 1. What do we as a movement want to achieve? Do we run a website or
>>> foster free knowledge? Why are we doing the things we do, and what
>>> for?
>>> 2. How do we define impact when exploring new territory? And how do we
>>> measure success?
>>> 3. What is the role of the Wikimedia Foundation?
>>> 4. How do we want to communicate with each other? How can we build the
>>> necessary empathy and learn from each other? How can we overcome the
>>> old narrative and perceptions?
>>> 5. Where does the money come from and where should it go? Should money
>>> be the limiting factor when striving for Free Knowledge?
>>> 6. What movement framework is best suited to fulfil the Wikimedia
>>> mission?
>>>
>>> The way things are at present inhibits the movement from striving
>>> effectively for Free Knowledge. Instead of using its full potential to
>>> further its mission, it revolves around itself. The common mission is
>>> at serious risk if the movement does not tackle the causes of its
>>> problems.
>>>
>>> These tough questions can only be approached in a structured and
>>> professional way, with dedication and commitment. There is no point in
>>> tinkering with the symptoms and finding single-problem solutions.
>>>
>>> The Chapters Dialogue concludes with the recommendation to build upon
>>> the insights and to initiate a sequel: the design of a framework for
>>> the Wikimedia movement in which it can work strongly and effectively
>>> towards its mission in a professional way, yet stay true to its
>>> grassroots and maintain its diversity.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>>>
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>>> Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/GuidelinesWikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
>>> Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Everton Zanella Alvarenga (also Tom)
>>> Open Knowledge Brasil - Rede pelo Conhecimento Livre
>>>
http://br.okfn.org
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> WikimediaBR-l mailing list
>>> WikimediaBR-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WikimediaBR-l mailing list
>> WikimediaBR-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> WikimediaBR-l mailing list
> WikimediaBR-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l
>
>
--
Everton Zanella Alvarenga (also Tom)
Open Knowledge Brasil - Rede pelo Conhecimento Livre
http://br.okfn.org