Ow, se acha um puxa-saco, envie para mim email com o título "Eu sou
um puxa-saco" que eu lhe respondo os motivos tranquilamente, ou fale
na lista que eu mando em ppv. Para que tem que me atacar em tudo o que
eu faço? Só porque eu acho que o modelo que foi aplicado no seu
programa ruim? Só porque eu acho que poderia ser optimizado? E que
você deveria tentar entender muito mais sobre o Movimento Wikimedia,
ao invés de se focar na Wikipedia? E recebi toneladas de emails em off
dando apoio e sugestões de atividades, Nenhum contrário, e nenhum
ataque a mim, a não ser aqui, que eu só sugeri para terem cuidado,
pois tinha muita gente apoiando.
E me calar? Que ser superior é você para dizer para alguém se calar?
Que dom divido lhe foi concedido para poder censurar alguém?
On Jan 26, 10:59 am, Otavio Louvem <otavio1981.w...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Cuidado com o que? seja claro ou resigne-se ao
silêncio. Melhor direcionar
suas "dicas" em off para quem for de direito e poupar a lista de seus
faniquitos.
Otavio
Em 25 de janeiro de 2012 23:21, Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton <
rodrigo.argen...(a)gmail.com> escreveu:
Porque a carapuça serviu?
E não é uma ameaça, estou falando para terem cuidado, pelas respostas
off que eu recebi é só isso.
Paranoia ta foda aqui
On Jan 25, 1:30 pm, Otavio Louvem
<otavio1981.w...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Não bastasse a falta de educação recorrente, agora vai ameaçar outros
> voluntários?
> OTAVIO1981
> Em 25 de janeiro de 2012 11:58, Rodrigo
Tetsuo Argenton <
> rodrigo.argen...(a)gmail.com> escreveu:
> > Só para os puxas-sacos que eu estou
metendo pau de novo. E se forem
> > puxar-saco, tomem cuidado, fica a dica.
> > ---------- Forwarded message
----------
> > From: Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton <rodrigo.argen...(a)gmail.com>
> > Date: 25 January 2012 11:51
> > Subject: Waste of money, Wikipediacentrism. - Brazil
> > To: foundatio...(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> Dear
all,
> Well as you know, Brazil is a priority, but when spending is a waste.
> We have a volunteer group that operates in Brazil since 2008 in direct
> contact with the problems of Brazil, know much about the free national
> culture, know a lot about education in the country, and their
projects, they
> can tell the reasons why Brazil has poor
performance on Wikipedia.
> Wikimedia Foundation conducted several interviews with the group, I was
> interviewed three times and had several conversations with several
different
> employees. Also recently a person was hired
to do a search on this,
already
> operating in Brazil.
> And yesterday they announced the arrival of two more employees to ask
only
> > that, again. [1] They already have the answer to these interviews, what
> > they are asking again?
> And
what I find worse is the fact that there is a prohibitive message
for
> explanation of other Wikimedia projects. As
for the local group that
> Wikipedia is not central. And there will be an office of WMF, only to
> activities for Wikipedia. And many Brazilians criticize the model of
the
> WMF, and that centralization in Wikipedia.
Wikipedia is only the tenth
> seventh most visited site in the country. Need better, yes, but the
> problem is the community that is not healthy, and that the WMF does not
> interfere on that. So it's skating, and spending resources
unnecessarily.
>
Several staff members say the Wikipedia impact is larger than the other
> projects.
> Which has more impact for you?
> "The Movement Wikimedia projects through education, created free
> educational resources available in Wikibooks, and classes on
Wikiversity,
> > this could change the lives of thousands of poor children" or
> > "The Movement Wikimedia succeeded in creating an encyclopaedia in
> > Portuguese high quality "
>
Unfortunately I live in a country that 38% of teens lives in extreme
> poverty [2], how they want to create a program just with universities,
to
> share knowledge if people that never walk
inside one university? Or not
> be able to read the contents of Wikipedia because they were not
properly
> literate. I'm not talking to literate
Brazilians, I'm talking to
create free
> educational resources, and create classes,
and encourage businesses
and organizations
> > to do that change, this is a collaborative work.
> With
the money spent to keep three people six days in Brazil from the
U.S.A.,
> we could fund a fellow to start a social
work with teachers to create
this
> > material.What is the interest of the WMF on this? "Our priority is
> > Wikipedia"
>
*Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in
> the sum of all knowledge. That's our commitment.
> *
> I'll keep imagining, and having to push myself very hard to see this
> world. That will never be reached by Wikipedia alone.Especially in
Brazil.
> If
it were to promote Wikipedia as a site, it would be best to hire a
company,
> > not a Foundation, if that way selected, do things as a Foundation.
> > Sorry for my English, I'm tired and
I didn't review.
> [1]
>https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Esplanada/geral/Wikip%C3.
..
> [2]
>http://noticias.r7.com/brasil/noticias/adolescentes-sao-mais-pobres-q.
..
> > --
> > Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton
> > rodrigo.argen...(a)gmail.com
> > +55 11 7971-8884
> > --
> > Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton
> > rodrigo.argen...(a)gmail.com
> > +55 11 7971-8884
> >
_______________________________________________
> > WikimediaBR-l mailing list
> > WikimediaB...(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> >https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l
> --
> Abs,
> Otavio
_______________________________________________
WikimediaBR-l mailing list
WikimediaB...@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://
lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l
_______________________________________________
WikimediaBR-l mailing list
WikimediaB...(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l
--
Abs,
Otavio
_______________________________________________
WikimediaBR-l mailing list
WikimediaB...@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l