Também envolve uma série de questões mal resolvidas anteriormente. Aliás,
acho que todo wikidrama é assim.
Eu pessoalmente deletaria da face da terra a extensão causadora da guerra
de edições (ainda estou tentando descobrir a funcionalidade de algo que
oculta informações para ampliar alguns centímetros das imagens que já eram
ampliadas com um clique...) e esse recurso de proteção das proteções, e
trancaria o Erik num quartinho sem Internet, aparelhos eletrônicos ou
livros por algumas horas, mas... rs
Em 11/08/2014 11:07, "Everton Zanella Alvarenga" <tom(a)okfn.org.br>
escreveu:
Esse é a mais recente wiki-novela envolvendo a relação
entre a comunidade
e a WMF:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Superprotect_rights
Por mais errada que possa ter sido a atitude por parte de um funcionário
da WMF (não vi os detalhes), é impressionante o grau de agressividade de
alguns voluntários em alguns momentos.
A WP PT já deve estar sabendo, pois fiquei sabendo via José Ribeiro num
tópico da esplanada sobre o encontro do fim do mês. Mas divulgando aqui a
quem interessar possa.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: John Mark Vandenberg <jayvdb(a)gmail.com>
Date: 2014-08-10 14:29 GMT-03:00
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] [Wikitech-l] Superprotect user right, Comming
to a wiki near you
To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 10:08 PM, MZMcBride <z(a)mzmcbride.com> wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
>On 10 August 2014 15:51, MZMcBride <z(a)mzmcbride.com> wrote:
>> You'd been threatening to implement super-protection for a long time. I
>> see you finally made good on this very bad idea. This is certainly
bold,
>> but also incredibly reckless. Your
response to being told "we don't
like
your software" is to try shove it down a wiki
community's throat?
I thought this was a response to someone hamfistedly editing en:wp's
JS and *actually breaking it*. When Erik reverted this change and said
"don't break the damn wiki", the response was "but we can so we should
be able to!" and an attempt to take the Foundation to en:wp
arbitration. The obvious response is to make it so that such
blithering stupidity can't be enacted again.
Super-protection was implemented in response to the German, not English,
Wikipedia. It turns out that multiple communities don't like MediaViewer.
Erik is squarely responsible for the mess being made here and deserves
the
full blame and consequences. He instigated the
arbitration case on the
English Wikipedia and he's now instigating a war with the German
Wikipedia.
The German Wikipedia community has looked at and evaluated MediaViewer
and
has decided that it doesn't want MediaViewer
enabled on its wiki. Erik
has
made it his mission to force MediaViewer on the
German Wikipedians (and
the Commoners), using system administrators and community advocates and
anyone else he can coerce. This is unacceptable behavior on Erik's part.
MediaViewer is an entirely supplementary feature, not some fundamental or
critical piece of infrastructure in desperate need of protection.
As this has wide-ranging implications, I have started an RFC on meta
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Superprotect_rights
--
John Vandenberg
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/GuidelinesWikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
Unsubscribe:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
--
Everton Zanella Alvarenga (also Tom)
Open Knowledge Brasil - Rede pelo Conhecimento Livre
http://br.okfn.org
_______________________________________________
WikimediaBR-l mailing list
WikimediaBR-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l