Ni!
Thomas, eu não acho adequado encaminhar esse link ao Dalton antes de oferecê-lo ao comitê de capítulos, para o qual estamos esperando alguém se voluntariar a terminar de compôr o relatório do capítulo para o último ano.
http://br.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia:Chapter_Report/2009
Acho que ele poderia até ler, mas com uma colocação clara do que significa estra mostrando isso pra ele. Se é um pedido de opinião ou outra coisa. Eu ainda não sei se ele está tentando ajudar ou se está tentando colocar-se no lugar do comitê.
Abraços,
ale ~~
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 16:19 -0300, Thomas de Souza Buckup wrote:
Thomas Dalton,
I'm not on Interal-L, nor is any other Wikimedia volunteer from Brazil. This is why I'm making the suggestion below. Feel free to share this message on Internal-L.
Instead of discussing on Internal-L, among only yourselves, the arguments collaboratively created by Brazilian volunteers, I believe we should discuss them on the wiki page where it was originally created, right?
http://br.wikimedia.org/wiki/Relacionamento_com_a_Wikimedia_Foundation/Comit...
Could you please post your comment on the discussion page associated with the link above? I'd love to carry on with the discussion with you and any other interested person there.
Thanks,
Thomas de Souza Buckup
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote: Thank you for sending us this explanation. I'm afraid a disagree agree with your reasons, though.
> Reasons > The single most important reason is scalability in the Brazilian context. > Brazil has almost two hundred million people spread over a continental area, > with strikingly unequal distribution of wealth and education. > Incorporating and maintaining a Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) in > Brazil represents a significant cost, and authority hierarchies create > distrust and dissipate the motivation of volunteers. Does incorporating and maintaining an NGO in Brazil could significantly more than in other countries? I disagree about hierarchies creating distrust. A chapter doesn't need a strong hierarchy, it just needs one to handle admin and money, really. A well-run chapter shouldn't dissipate motivation. > Thus, a single Wikimedia chapter would not be able to handle the diversity > of challenges and the organizational overhead. I don't see how that follows.
WikimediaBR-l mailing list WikimediaBR-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediabr-l