Hi again,
Another potentially interesting podcast for some touching this matter (more or less): https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/17/podcasts/hard-fork-bing-ai-elon.html
Linked to the ones I sent before on the other thread.
If this is the new Napster revolution equivalent, yeah I know... back in the day, buckle up!
Cheers,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023, 17:33 Jimmy Wales jimmywales@wikitribune.com wrote:
Speaking only for myself, out of curiosity, some real world examples might be helpful here. I don't have access to Bing's version yet, but I do have access to chat.openai.com which is very impressive but deeply flawed.
I asked "Who is Kate Garvey?" (my wife, known a bit to the media, but not famous) and the answer is weird and laughably bad with more sentences false than true. Among other silly things, it says that she worked for Theresa May and was involved with Brexit negotiations, which if you knew my wife's politics borders on libel. It also says she co-founded an organization (which as far as I can tell, it just made up out of thin air) with Nick Clegg's wife. It's completely mad.
On 2023-02-20 09:34, Anders Wennersten wrote:
BIng with ChatGPT is now released by Micrsoft. > > And from what I
understand they use Wikipedia content considerably. > If you ask Who is A B and A B is not widely known, the result is more > or less identical to the content from the Wikipedia article (but > worse, as it "makes up" facts that is incorrect). > > In a way I am glad to see Wikipedia is fully relevant even in this > emerging AI-driven search world. But Google search has ben careful to > always have a link to Wikipedia besides their made up summary of > facts, which here it is missing (yet?). And for licences, they are > all ignored. > > So if this is the future the number of accesses from users to > Wikipedia will collapse, and also their willingness to donate... (but > our content still a cornerstone for knowledge) > > Anders > > (I got a lot of fact from an article in Swedish main newspaper by > their tech editor. He started asking fact of himself, and when he > received facts from his Wp article plus being credited to a book he > had noting to do with, he started to try to tell/learn ChatGPT of > this error. The chatPGT only got angry accusing the techeditor for > lying and in the end cut off the conversation, as ChatGPT continued > to teat the techeditor as lyer and vandal..). > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing > list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l Public archives at > https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/...
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/... To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-leave@lists.wikimedia.org