*FYI - The two "Fellows" are WMIN chapter members and signatories on its bank account.*
Thanks but that only make things worse to me. So, the people who are paid by WMF are the ones taking care of WMIN money? Only I see the COI here? _____ *Béria Lima* http://wikimedia.pt/(351) 925 171 484
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. Ajude-nos a construir esse sonho. http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos*
On 12 November 2011 05:33, wheredevelsdare@hotmail.com wrote:
FYI - The two "Fellows" are WMIN chapter members and signatories on its bank account.
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 18:41:43 +0000 From: berialima@gmail.com To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Fwd: Wikimedia India Program Trust
Disclaimer: I'm not Indian, and I don't know much about the Indian operations, but I needed to answer about something I do know.
*Anirudh said: WMIN and WIPT will theoretically compete for funding
within
India, much of which will be allocated to WIPT, given that it is professionalized (and because we never had a chance) and in WMF's good graces.*
*And Bishakha answered: As I understand it, WMIN has received a grant from WMF, so I can't understand how it "never had a chance".** *
Ok talking about grants: WMIN has so far 2 grants: a Bootstrap Granthttp://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:WM_IN/Bootstrap_Grantand a grant for WCI 2011 <
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:WM_IN/WikiConference_India_2011
(since this grant<
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:WM_IN/Wiki_Community_development_in_In...
state in the begin that is not a chapter grant, despite the fact that has the WMIN in the title). One is for a ver specif thing - a conference -
who
is being leading by 2 "fellows" of WMF. The second one has nothing to do with professionalization. So when comes to funding, if they decide to collect funds locally, would be incredible difficult to "fight against"
the
WIPT who is full of employees[1] who are used to work with that for
years.
That was - I believe - Anirudh's point.
[1] I'm in WMIN ML and I see a hiring once per month, sometimes more. _____ *Béria Lima* http://wikimedia.pt/(351) 925 171 484
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. Ajude-nos a construir esse sonho. http://wikimedia.pt/Donativos*
On 11 November 2011 17:34, Bishakha Datta bishakhadatta@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Anirudh Bhati anirudhsbh@gmail.com wrote:
The initial idea, if I understood it correctly, was to establish
another
non-profit body within India, for a period of three to five years to execute specific (and large-scale) programmes. As of now, the WIPT (Wikimedia India Program Office) can pretty much do anything it wants
with
the Wikimedia brand - partner with institutions, raise money locally,
have
paid employees and bypass community.
From what I have seen, the program office does not behave like a law
unto
itself, as implied above.
This is what I foresee happening: WMIN will be involved in community-building and small-scale projects
which
support volunteers and the WIPT will partner with large institutions
in
India (who are understandably looking to club with international organizations), get a lot of media coverage and acquire the big
grants
(since WMIN is not a professional body).
WMIN has already had interest from and meetings with other donors, including pretty big ones in India (I was there at one such in 2010),
so
why this feeling that WMIN can't acquire the big grants?
WMIN and WIPT will theoretically compete for funding within India, much of which will be allocated to
WIPT,
given that it is professionalized (and because we never had a
chance) and
in WMF's good graces.
As I understand it, WMIN has received a grant from WMF, so I can't understand how it "never had a chance".
This is how WMIN has been made redundant (something that I have been saying for a long, long time).
I really don't get this. Given that India is a huge country - with
more
than 1 billion people - and zillions of opportunities to grow editing communities in different languages, how can WMIN become or be made redundant? Also, given that the chapter is less than a year old, and
has
some new office-bearers, and has announced new plans for moving
forward,
how is it redundant?
My personal view is that there is enough work ahead for not just one,
or
two, but numerous entities, formal and informal, to enter the fray and actualize this potential. Already, there are many more requests for collaboration within India than either WMIN or WIPT or both put
together
can handle.
Given this huge potential, I don't see why this discussion has to be
framed
through the lens of competition or territoriality.
Cheers Bishakha _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l