Anthere-
This is exactly what I said very recently. Till recently, wikipedia-l was the list to discuss project wide discussion.
It is now, as the name suggests, the list to discuss project wide issues for *WIKIPEDIA*. There is also Wikisource, Wikibooks, Wikiquote, Wiktionary, etc. The issues discussed in your post affect *all* these projects. Such matters belong on foundation-l.
In short, Erik, the difference between wikipedia-l and foundation-l is now difficult to define.
It is very easy to define. foundation-l is intended for Wikimedia-wide issues, wikipedia-l is intended for Wikipedia-wide issues, wikitech-l is the technical equivalent to foundation-l. So a post regarding server messages would be appropriate on wikitech-l and foundation-l, but not on wikipedia-l.
The only reason I called it foundation-l and not wikimedia-l is to avoid constant wikimedia/wikipedia typos.
I am wondering if that bug report page is very wise, and if we should not just redirect it simply to SourceForge.
SourceForge is our bug tracking mechanism. The only other bug reports page that matters is on test.wikipedia.org. What might make sense is a kind of queue where people who don't speak English can report bugs, and people who do can translate this into English and enter it into the tracker.
Regards,
Erik