But then we have the following contradicting statements (and both are yours):
1. a Wikipedia is granted to a language not a country 2. the Moldovan language is in fact the Romanian language (the fact that it's written in Cyrillic is as relevant as proposing a project for English written in Thai)
So then, which *language* is this about?
Gutza
On 13-Oct-10 04:37, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi, The solution of a dissolution of the mo.wikipedia is in the recognition that it is Romanian language written in Cyrillic. This is the central argument and, consequently the Romanian language is part of an acceptable solution. Thanks, GerardM
On 13 October 2010 03:34, Gutza gutza@moongate.ro wrote:
On 13-Oct-10 04:29, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Remember, a Wikipedia is granted to a language not a country.
True. But which language is this about, specifically?
Gutza
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l