Hoi, One is not really a good thing to do. Projects have to find their own way. Two is not really a good thing to do. Projects are independent and it is not for the German, the English Wikipedia to determine what the Frisian Wikipedia is to do. "Issues with projects as a whole" sounds to be rather nebulous. What kind of issues would they be and under what circumstances would it make sense for an outside body to get involved ? Thanks, GerardM
On Jan 5, 2008 8:17 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
Ok. Functions for a meta-arbcom. So far, I can see three general ideas for the kinds of cases they could consider:
- The same kind of cases local arbcoms consider, but on projects
which are too small to have an arbcom. 2) The same kind of cases local arbcoms consider, but when they affect multiple projects. 3) Issues with projects as a whole.
I suggest we try and complete this list, and then we can move on to discussing which items on the list should and should not be part of meta-arbcom's remit.
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l