On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 9:53 AM, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
2009/1/30 Andrew Whitworth wknight8111@gmail.com:
I'm certainly anti-censorship, so I don't advocate deleting all or any nude photographs. However, asking uploaders a few basic questions about their uploaded nudes (is the depicted model above the age of consent? is the depicted model aware that this photograph was taken? Is the depicted model aware that this photo is being uploaded here?) could help a lot of people avoid a lot of problems. Remember, it's not just the WMF who risks potential problems (and admittedly as an ISP the WMF's risk is probably very low), it's the people who are being depicted abusively that are going to have the biggest problems with these images.
--Andrew Whitworth
I would probably view it as an issue of image quality. We have had Template:Nopenis for some time which among other things focuses on quality.
The providence of an image is a quality issue. Since we have no shortage of pics of women in various states of undress (see Category:Nude women and Category:Female genitalia) some of which have fairly clear providence (see Category:SuicideGirls for example) I see no reason why we should accept further images of questionable providence and quality.
I've already created Template:Nobreasts and it would probably useful if someone put together Template:Novulva
Wouldn't a generic solution be more adequate? Certainly better than going through all of the human anatomy.
-Chad