Delirium delirium@hackish.org writes:
Anders Wegge Keller wrote:
Could you please keep the amount of crackpotish kookery at a minimum at this list?
In what respect is it "crackpottish" or "kookery" to suggest that even appearance of impropriety, even where none exists, is damaging to nonprofit organizations that depend on public goodwill?
Except for being the umpteent person to continue the line of aggressive questioning, none. You just happened to be the unlucky roll of the dice.