Forgive me if I find these resolutions rather toothless; this is another in a string of board resolutions that simply "urge the projects." I'd love to understand what the Board thinks such resolutions will accomplish. I understand there are legal constraints on the ability of the Foundation to exercise control over content, but these "urgings" are weakly stated even compared to other Foundation content resolutions (c.f. the licensing policy). Statements of principle are all well and good, but when community positions are firmly entrenched they are likely to have little impact. In the area of images of identifiable subjects, I suspect the WMF will need to be sued over a particularly vicious set of circumstances before substantial progress will be made, and that is disappointing.
Nathan