On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:48 AM, svetlana svetlana@fastmail.com.au wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, at 10:46, svetlana wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, at 23:42, Romaine Wiki wrote:
That the community reacts the way it does now, is because they care very much about the site and they notice something is terrible going wrong on WMF side and too less is done to fix those problems/issues!
if the community was not so willing to use force (ie a js hack) against the other party
instead of talking properly
then the superprotect wouldn't exist at all
you seeing the problem there? whose problem is it? desire to act out of the blue instead of collaborating they didn't collaborate at all they added the js hack as if it was something urgent, that needs saving people from
i would only do this if someone added a virus into mv by mistake
this community thinks that its power structures allow to tromp onto other people
sysops aren't even held accountable they are elected once for an infinite term nobody reviews their contribution in position in power ever
this would surely be solved by making them elected on a 2-year term then re-elect
Hi svetlana, there are several large wikis which have sysop re-election policies; notably, German Wikipedia.