I thought Stephen's original post to this list was fine, and his voice is not one that we hear very often.
Extended specific discussions about project policies or articles might be better on wikipedia-l or commons-l, but if we had a "rule" that you can never mention a specific topic on this list that could arguably be posted on another more relevant email list, there would not be much to discuss. The Science Alert post [1] may not be original, but perhaps some people had not thought about theories of self organizing systems applying to our projects, so worth taking a look at for that reason.
Links 1. http://www.sciencealert.com/wikipedia-is-basically-just-another-old-fashione...
Thanks, Fae
On 30 April 2016 at 07:19, Keegan Peterzell keegan.wiki@gmail.com wrote:
Why is it that when we want to be critical of our internal movement collaborators this list is the primary vehicle for personal insult from micro-aggressions to outright hostility, but this discussion is off-topic?
-- ~Keegan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keegan
This is my personal email address. Everything sent from this email address is in a personal capacity. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe