*@Domas, @Tim: As Wikimedia tech staff. Have you changed your mind? Are you working to blackout English Wikipedia?*
See the Wikitech-l mailing list. The technical discussion seems to be over there, at least in part. The matter seems to be more a "How can we get this done properly wiithout breaking a load of other things before the appointed date" then a "We don't want to do this". There is a prototype over here: ( https://test.wikipedia.org/?banner=SOPA_blackout_alt), for which i hasten to add that it is only a technical prototype, with no final text, layout and so on.
~Excirial
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:00 PM, emijrp emijrp@gmail.com wrote:
2011/10/28 Tim Starling tstarling@wikimedia.org
On 28/10/11 01:43, emijrp wrote:
Obvious sarcasm is obvious. But people think you are serious.
I'm not sure who is more dangerous, stupid politicians speaking about closing sites or stupid wikipedians closing Wikipedia sites when
politicians
speak about closing sites.
About 90% of everything that comes out of Domas's mouth is sarcasm. So if you don't know whether he's being sarcastic about something, you can assume that he is and get it right 90% of the time.
Domas probably had the same reaction to the Italian Wikipedia protest as I did. We both spend a lot of time making sure Wikipedia is always up and available for people to read, so it's painful to see a small proportion of a wiki's users decide to take a whole wiki offline for everyone.
-- Tim Starling
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative#Comment_on_blackouts_...
"...it is very likely that we will not be able to make 100% sure that nobody can access Wikipedia..."
@Domas, @Tim: As Wikimedia tech staff. Have you changed your mind? Are you working to blackout English Wikipedia? _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l