That sounds more like an indictment of the organization of images, rather than the images themselves.
DM
On 1/29/09, Jesse Plamondon-Willard pathoschild@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 8:50 PM, David Moran fordmadoxfraud@gmail.com wrote:
"Commons is meant to be a collection of freely-licensed media, not a
dumping
ground for all media that happens to be free."
What's the difference?
"Collection" implies some sort of useful organization and coherence, with images added for their presumed usefulness. "Dumping ground" implies a disorganized pile, with images added at random or without regard to their presumed usefulness.
-- Yours cordially, Jesse Plamondon-Willard (Pathoschild)
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l