Il giorno mar 14 mag 2019 alle ore 15:46 Yann Forget yannfo@gmail.com ha scritto:
Le mar. 14 mai 2019 à 15:32, Andy Mabbett andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk a écrit :
On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 04:50, Yann Forget yannfo@gmail.com wrote:
Currently, we require a confirmation via OTRS if an image was
previously
published elsewhere before being uploaded to Commons.
Really? can you provide a link to a policy age proving that assertion?
Your claim rather makes a mockery of the suggestion that people should publish to, for example, Flickr before importing to commons
Unless the external publication is done with a free license, of course. AFAIK, there is no "official" suggestion that people should publish to Flickr before importing to Commons.
For EU citizens upload at Flickr could actually reduce our GDPR-responsibility as platform.
Il giorno mar 14 mag 2019 alle ore 16:03 Lane Rasberry < lane@bluerasberry.com> ha scritto:
The answer is not to lower the quality of our content, but rather to communicate more effectively the standard of quality that we require. With our standards already being so low, requiring things like proof of legal compliance, minimal verifiability, and having brief civil conversations in case of difficulty, it is challenging for me to imagine us reducing any of these already reasonable expectations.
+10
Il giorno lun 13 mag 2019 alle ore 21:42 Isaac Olatunde < reachout2isaac@gmail.com> ha scritto:
Not all local sysops have a strong knowledge of image licensing and I think allowing local sysops not familiar with image licensing and how Commons community works in general to delete\undelete files would be counterproductive.
I still think they can just left performing actions at their own responsibility.
Il giorno mar 14 mag 2019 alle ore 15:25 Paulo Santos Perneta < paulosperneta@gmail.com> ha scritto:
Nah, of course they do. We are using filters at the Portuguese Wikipedia since 2009, and I can say, without blinking, that if it was not for filters, IPs would have ceased to be allowed to edit at all there for good now, so much it is the amount of IP vandalism that they automatically catch and block... per hour. With some false positives in the middle, of course, but nothing is perfect.
I agree, but most of abusefilter effectiveness lies in 'block' option, which is not so common among wikis.
Vito