On Mon, 23 May 2011 16:55:49 +0200, Peter Gervai grinapo@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 16:46, WereSpielChequers werespielchequers@gmail.com wrote:
Re the idea of informing BLP subjects that we have a biography on them.
Most LPs would read such email as a request for editing, which is basically removing negative parts (regardless of its sourcing) and boosting positive parts, possibly include lots of irrelevant details. That is my _guess_, based on a specific LP I know [myself].
I fully agree.
In addition, it is not clear how to identify an editor with the person the article is about, and why the person (provided he/she is identified) should have the priority in adding/removing info.
Cheers Yaroslav