On 17/10/2007, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
Such as an editor who believes he knows better than others on copyright issues and implies he has the approval of the Jimbo and the ability to see that the foundation shuts down a project if the contributors do not submit to his opinion. This is an extreme case where action is needed.
We need a new rule: "Thou shalt not take Jimbo's name in vain."
Referring to such as "Jimbomancy" is helpful in English.
If Jimbo has an opinion on an issue, he can speak for himself, I'm sure.
Thankfully he usually diplomatically refrains from such ;-)
- d.