Yeah, the funny thing is that Wikimedia needs dev's a hell of a lot more than it needs editors or even admins. Why are they so hard to get? We're all geeks, right? Step up, people!
It was posted here recently that KDE ( http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2006-September/010129.html ) is interested in doing some training type thing with Wikiversity. I think this is a brilliant idea. Mediawiki development was mentioned in passing and it's a shame it probably won't happen. It doesn't really help that the documentation is quite often all over the place, spread over 2 wikis, sometimes without even mentioning which version is being talked about. I found this a hassle just trying to administrate my own wiki and frequent comments on meta show that many others do too. So to really get into it, you have to really immerse yourself in it, which is not really as easy as just checking your watchlist each day.
To Birgitte: I recommend befriending some developer or toolserver types, and occasionally throw in a casual request for the status of your latest (least) favourite bug. See if you can get someone to write a toolserver tool that performs more or lless the same function as MediaWiki should. This has been a remarkably successful approach at Commons, although we'd prefer the MW solution of course. :)
Oh and voting means nothing, except for email update reminders.
That all said, I recognise the dev's face incredible demands on their time from everyone and everything, including many 'invisible' factors (well, invisible until they break!) and obviously worship the ground they work on. (Please fix my bugs. Really. :))
cheers Brianna user:pfctdayelise
On 24/09/06, Birgitte SB birgitte_sb@yahoo.com wrote:
How many months/years do you believe is a realistic expectation?
Birgitte SB
--- GerardM gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, Most of the developers are volunteers. There is certainly too much work in the first place. It is a stellar performance what so few people do with so little investment.
Their first priority is to keep the servers operational, combine this with the growth that we experience this is a big job. There are several big jobs that have been postponed time and again for many many months (think single login or the inclusion of software that has been programmed and is waiting for inclusion in the software).
When you find yourself a developer to program for you, it does not mean that the software will be accepted; the only thing achieved is that you are closer to getting it accepted. This is not to say that Bugzilla is busted, it is that your expectations are not compatible with reality.
PS when you expect developers to reply to your wishes, you have to realise that that too is work..
Thanks, GerardM
On 9/23/06, Birgitte SB birgitte_sb@yahoo.com wrote:
The subject line pretty much sums this note up. I
am
frustrated with the continued lack of development support for anything where the propents are not actually developers themselves. I have aware for sometime that asking for anything without
uploading a
"patch" is absolutely useless. So I accepted
people
that don't know what a patch is are just screwed.
But
I have recently realized many of developments
which
have never happened *did* have attachments (which
I
think are "patches"). The bugzilla system really
must
be broken. Because how can these things just be ignored for so long? Here is the bug which had
the
most effort invested in it from WS.
http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4375
This feature was so desired by people Wikisource a show of support by 15 separte languages was orchestrated hoping it would have some effect.
http://wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Vote_on_enabling_the_ProtectSection_ex...
This was back in January. Nothing ever happened.
The
underlying problem this feature would solve will
now
hopefully be able to be addressed by "Stable
version".
At least I hope "stable versions" will be
workable.
But the last email about how de.WP wants a much
more
complicated system for this worries me.
There are other technical issues that have
projects on
WS at a standstill.
http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5881
I ask people online. Bugs are filed. Nothing happens. I do not want to make the effort to get
all
sub-domains to show support for these new features when it will have no effect. I realize that the developers are volunteers and are able to chose
what
interests them and where they would like to work.
But
they do not even give any feedback or even tell us they will not help us and we should learn to live without it. We just wait month upon month hoping
it
is on someone's to-do list somewhere. It is
beyond
frustrating. Has anyone else experienced these problems?
Birgitte SB
Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l