Exactly.
Chad H.
On Jan 7, 2008 3:29 PM, Nathan nawrich@gmail.com wrote:
Well, if they can't be bothered to submit to the process of reviewing fair use images then that is a minor problem, we want to limit these images anyway.
On Jan 7, 2008 3:21 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/01/2008, Nathan nawrich@gmail.com wrote:
All this would do is reduce the number of images by
creating more hoops to jump through - such a reduction doesn't discriminate between good and bad images.
Sure it does. You can't add an image with a non-free license to an article without approval, and non-free license content that is not attached to an article is deleted automatically.
The reduction I'm talking about isn't the images that get rejected, it's the images that people don't even try to add because they can't be bothered with the hassle. *That* is indiscriminate. The images that get rejected are going to the same images as get removed at the moment, it will just happen earlier, that's all.
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l