Perfect statement: only one correction: you need to negate the following phrase...
And, if they are *un*able to read and cite it...
If every country would vote an equivalent law for Free Knowledge, the world would become a better place to live...
-- Geert Van Pamel
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Wikimedia-l wikimedia-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org Namens Jake Orlowitz Verzonden: maandag 20 april 2020 22:11 Aan: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Onderwerp: [Wikimedia-l] Comment Open on U.S. Open Access Policy
My Letter to the U.S. Office for Science and Technology Policy regarding a proposal for federally mandate open access to publicly-funded research...
---
Wikipedia is one of the ten most popular websites in the world. Each month 200,000 editors improve over 6 million articles. This vital public information is viewed on 1 billion unique devices as our pages are loaded by people around the globe 7,000 times per second.
Wikipedia is the "free encyclopedia", both in its open CC-BY-SA licensing as well as the unpaid contributions of its volunteer editors. Yet Wikipedia's hundreds of thousands of editors struggle to access scholarly research. And, if they are able to read and cite it, then hundreds of millions of readers cannot verify or explore it for deeper research.
Citations are the bridge between Wikipedia articles and a broader landscape of reliable, secondary sources. Citations not only allow readers to verify the reliability of the facts they find in Wikipedia; through citations readers can also deep-dive into any given topic by exploring the books, scholarly publications, and news stories referenced in an article.
A recently released dataset of all citations with identifiers in Wikipedia found that less than half of the official versions of scholarly publications cited with an identifier in Wikipedia are freely available on the web. This chasm of for editors and for readers is a tragedy of public education and digital literacy.
Just look at the most recent global catastrophe with Coronavirus. By April 2020 the main articles on COVID-19 had received 50 million views. Wikipedia's medical content--made up of more than 155,000 articles and 1 billion bytes of text across more than 255 languages--has been ranked as one of the top-3 most viewed sources for medical information on the entire internet.
References are essential to the public's trust in Wikipedia. Indeed, Wikipedia's medical content is supported by 757,855 references in English and 1,596,528 in other languages, for a total of 2,354,383 across all languages. In English 168,985 have a PMID while 261,850 do in other languages. This means at least 430,835 references are journal articles.
What happens when those journal articles lie behind a paywall? The public suffers from a dearth of good information to make decisions about their lives as independent citizens and members of a global community.
As founder of The Wikipedia Library, I arranged partnerships with dozens of leading scholarly journals, to give Wikipedia editors free access to their reliable content and so they would be able to do effective and rigorous research. This time-intensive process took 6 years to amass access to only 1/5th of the most highly regarded academic publications. Frankly, Wikipedia editors--volunteers who selflessly give of their intelligence and passion to educate--should not have to beg and borrow to access publicly-funded research. Readers should not hit paywalls when they are seeking citizen-supported knowledge.
I implore you to make the bold but entirely reasonable decision and ensure that taxpayers have access to the vital scientific and scholarly studies that they themselves fund. This is not only sensible, it is essential to civic health, societal progress, and human flourishing.
Sincerely, Jake Orlowitz Founder of The Wikipedia Library
---
"Public Access to Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Publications, Data and Code Resulting From Federally Funded Research"
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/02/19/2020-03189/request-for-... _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe