Michael R. Irwin wrote:
The appears enwiki-l stats appear to shut off at five posts. Perhaps the graphics is truncated for ease of use and the totals are accurate?
Yes indeed. This is on purpose. The table would be extraordinary large if I showed everyone who edited one or two times on a list. Yet the counts are complete. Those single edits are included.
On startup mailing lists I do show all data, even single posts.
I parse mailman archives. I do not use mail address, scan for username as z in "From: x at y (z)"
It seemed to accurately pick up posts signed as both mirwin and as my later handle lazyquasar but they were all annotated as from Michael R. Irwin in the header so that was not surprising.
Yes, as explained above.
Any further explanation to clarify exactly what is counted and how it is summarized if the data is not exactly accurate in the counts of all the emails in the archives would be appreciated by me.
Please ask if you have more questions.
Oh, I was asked why Jimbo has more posts than the board combined. That is because Jimbo preceded the board with quite a few months. :)
Erik Zachte