On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 13:59, Andreas Kolbe jayen466@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure that duplicating the work of a range of screen readers is the best use of our resources.
I agree; such functionality belongs in the user client (screen reader, browser, whatever), not in the subject website.
an excerpt from the marketing text
As a professional web manager (1994-2011), I had companies trying to sell me such services regularly. And why wouldn't they, given the number of websites they could sell it to, over, and over, and over, again?
Equally consistently, people who /needed/ such assistance told us they wanted it in the client, not the website; and that all they required of the websites was to be web-standards-complaint (by which they meant WCAG[1]).
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Content_Accessibility_Guidelines