Hoi, It is exactly to find out if it is an "otherwise accepted language" that the language committee wants to make sure that the content is coded in this way.. I would not be surprised when all the content in wikisource.org that is NOT English is not coded correctly in the first place. Thanks, GerardM
On 6/6/07, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
GerardM wrote:
Hoi, When Wikisource is having content in languages that did not pass the
process
for recognition for a new language for MediaWiki and for a Wikimedia Foundation project, and when this content is restricted to http://wikisource.org, there seems to be at first glance not much that
the
language committee has to deal with. The problem however is that a code
that
is used for such a language has to exist. There is also a need that the
meta
data uses the right code. This allows for the information to be
recognised
for the language that it is.
Having the right code for an otherwise accepted language is a problem on a completely different level from having a project in the language.
Also when a request is made for a language in Wikisource, it is can not
be
separated from the status that a language has in the wider Wikimedia
world.
An example are the two Belarusian languages that do not find it possible
to
collaborate. The only reason why there are two wikipedias is because the be-x-old data existed before the new policies came into effect. This
would
not have been accepted as a separate project on its own merits.
Perhaps Wikisource would find a way to accomodate both language forms in the same project. The original Belorussian texts were written as they were written. Texts in the new form are not likely to go into the public domain very soon.
Ec
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l