On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Yann Forget yann@forget-me.net wrote:
I didn't take part in the discussion and the vote, but this is a poor attempt to justify the old logo. People do not look at a web site like Wiktionary because of the logo.
Best regards, E.
Regards,
Yann
No, they don't, but since the more trafficked sites are likely to be more complete and with a larger community... You can infer that there are more people for the logo than against it, as demonstrated by which communities use it and which do not.
If there were specific issues with the new logo that remain unaddressed, perhaps the best thing to do is design a new logo that may not have those same problems?
The old logo is owned by the WMF, but the new logo doesn't appear in the Wikimedia Images category on the foundation wiki. Who owns the scrabble-like logo? As a last resort, would the Foundation impose a logo scheme on a project type where the communities couldn't come to consensus?
Last - should be noted that the wikimediafoundation.org site and the www.wiktionary.org use the old 'logo' to represent all Wiktionary projects.
Nathan