I think you've missed the point.
Mark
On 11/08/2008, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi. Given the current practice, this whole issue is irrelevant. There is an Arab project and this will continue to be the case. Thanks, GerardM
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Crazy Lover <always_yours.forever@yahoo.com
wrote:
Reviewing the requirements of current policy http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Language_proposal_policy i thought in standard arabic language, and the inevitable consecuense: this language cannot meet the requirement. Standard arabic isn't speak anymore as first language. it's based in Religious arabic languages, it's archaic, and it is neccesary to learn at school to understand it. its situation is similar to medieval latin. Then, the consecuense will be absurd: the rejection of any new project in this useful language.
on the other hand, there are several native languages, all daugthers of classical arabic, like Egyptian arabic (or Masri), whose proposal has been approved
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Egyptian... precissely for its native condition.
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l