Hoi, So you understand what a macro language is. Why the kicking then ? Thanks, GerardM
On 12 July 2011 10:59, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 08:03, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Macro languages are nicely defined. They are languages that used to be recognised at one time as a single language but are found to be a combination of multiple languages. Kicking the idea of macro-languages is daft; it is not only a result of the work of SIL it is more the
consequence
of the work of the maintainers of the iso-639-1 and the iso-639-3.
If you've read definition at SIL [1], you would know that it is just the first paragraph of the definition.
[1] http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/scope.asp#M
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l