On 7/5/07, Brion Vibber brion@wikimedia.org wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Just seen in the report: "Next, we discussed what do to with the wikipedia.com portal, and agreed to the concept of setting up a specific portal, where we could explain more about the projects, about the Foundation, welcome services etc... all things to be discussed in length as wikipedians know perfectly to do."
I would strongly object to this. The principle of least surprise would tell us to continue using *.wikipedia.com simply as a redirect to *.wikipedia.org.
[snip the good argumentation]
Seconded.
If we change one it should be wikipedia.org and wikipedia.com should stay a redirect.
As for different information, I believe wikimedia.org should be the one with information about the organisation(s) and possibly the projects.
Oscar and Erik did ask me to think about it a long time ago, and I never found the time.
Delphine