Erik Moeller a écrit:
Anthere-
- that rules be collectively worked on, so that
concerns voiced by non-supporters are taken into account. For this, I hope that many editors join the future project so that we all work on it.
Obviously; however, many of the objections were not "actionable", that is, they did not refer to any specific policy, but to the project as a whole as being undesirable. Any actionable objections shall be discussed in the usual wiki manner.
I would suggest that we try to contact some interested journalists and possibly have them join a sort of advisory board. What do you think ?
Advisory as in giving advice - absolutely. But not in setting the policy or being called upon to arbitrate matters of user conduct.
Absolutely. As I wrote "advisory". Deciding policies is community matter and arbitrating is something totally uncalled for anyone but a collective knowing community life and rules very well.
That would be a bit like when Jimbo discuss with those defining licences. They know licenses issues very well, and can both teach us relevant things, as well as be influenced on how to work on free licenses issues.