Anthony wrote:
Now, personally, the way I read "reasonable to the medium or means You are utilitzing", I think it means "what is reasonably necessary to provide proper attribution", not "what is reasonably necessary to maximize reuse". Erik seems to be pushing for the latter interpretation.
Without stipulating that that is what Erik really wants, I will just say that I fear what he has been so far proposing, in the absolute will not accomplish that end.
Instead it can completely prevent some reuse of material derived from wikipedia. That is prevent reuse of reused wikipedia material, breaking the viral nature of the inherent "copyleft"; in those jurisdictions where moral rights are inalienable. At least that is my understanding. I of course Am Not a Lawyer.
Yours,
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen