Hoi Tomasz,
You have a really strong opinion. When you read this thread, you will notice that it is not appreciated by many and seen as disruptive. Can you appreciate it in this way?
You argument about re-users is valid when you turn around the argument as well; as long as we do NOT have a take down notice re-users are better served by the continuation of the presence of images. Thanks, GerardM
On 30 December 2013 11:31, Tomasz W. Kozlowski tomasz@twkozlowski.netwrote:
Yann Forget wrote:
Are you suggesting that we can keep URAA affected data until we get a
takedown notice?
He is suggesting that, but apparently without realizing that his proposal stands in direct contradiction to our precautionary principle (COM:PRP) and to the way Commons cares about its re-users.
We cannot, will not and do not plan to keep files where there is significant doubt about their freedom, even if we do not get a takedown notice from the copyright holders.
Tomasz
Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe