Jimmy Wales wrote:
I fully support that we should accept images under all free licenses, using the aggregation clause of the GNU FDL. (Clause 7.)
This requires defining a free license, however:
-- Does requiring attribution (like old-style BSD) make the license non-free? Richard Stallman seems to think so, from what I can gather from gnu.org. -- Does permitting only verbatim redistribution make the license non-free? Many people (including myself) would argue so.
If we're going to allow things other than GFDL and public domain, we'll have to come up with a set of free software guidelines, much as Debian has done (either that, or agree to adopt one of the existing sets, either Debian's, or the FSF's, or some other one).
-Mark