Yonatan Horan wrote:
On 3/10/07, George Herbert wrote:
My questions:
Is the current he.wp rules structure which allegedly forbids the pornographic references documented?
What sort of documentation are you looking for? It is not quite an official policy and I have more than one admin at he who supports that argument. It is also not included in the "Deletion policy" page on he (although an admin tried to add it to the page, he was reverted and the page was protected and reverted back to the version that doesn't disallow articles on porn subjects).
Are/were the principles of natural justice being adhered to?
[e.g. an extract from Wikipedia:
Natural justice includes the notion of procedural fairness and may incorporate the following guidelines:
* A person accused of a crime, or at risk of some form of loss, should be given adequate notice about the proceedings (including any charges). * A person making a decision should declare any personal interest they may have in the proceedings. * A person who makes a decision should be unbiased and act in good faith. He therefore can not be one of the parties in the case, or have an interest in the outcome. This is expressed in the latin maxim, nemo judex in sua causa: "no man is permitted to be judge in his own cause". * Proceedings should be conducted so they are fair to all the parties - expressed in the latin maxim audi alteram partem: "let the other side be heard".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_justice ]
- luke