It's certainly possible (and I'm not saying this is what happened because I have absolutely no idea) that the articles were being developed by someone who interviewed people who work for the Foundation, and that person was forbidden to submit the articles, or told to remove some things.
On 18/05/2008, George Herbert george.herbert@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm. I don't know that it's possible to exercise pre-publication control when the article is live to the public the moment it's created...
POST-publication control, such as removing libelous or offensive or questionable content, has been held to be protected under CDA and other legal theories.
I think WikiLeaks are confused.
-- -george william herbert george.herbert@gmail.com
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l