That one first, and second that it does not even matter. We should appreciate that Nat came up with this statement, which is written in her name, not even as a Board resolution, perfectly knowing that it would not be fully accepted by the active part of the community, and she woull be a target of attacks. I fully agree that the attacks are absolutely uncalled for, even if many of us find the statement insufficient.
We are clearly in the middle of a pretty deep crisis (which was, to be honest, fully predictable) and we must welcome all efforts to deal with the crisis. It is unfortunate that these crises come all over and over again, and I believe this is a structural problem (there is some helpful discussion at the Meta talk page, which will probably not follow up as similar discussions have never been followed up previously). This is not a situation created by the current Board members, and whereas they are partially responsible for not solving it (in the same sense they are responsible for everything happening in the WikiVerse), there is no reason they should resign over it.
Best regards Yaroslav
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 9:56 AM revi lists@revi.email wrote:
Hi,
- 14:13, Gnangarra gnangarra@gmail.com 작성:
Nat insulted an ESEAP affiliate because she wanted a European affiliate to endorse her nomination.
Fact check: that was Shani Evanstein.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Affiliate-selected_Board_seats/2019/Nom... _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe