Brian wrote:
Human rights is a global problem.
http://www.amnestyusa.org/Our_Issues/By_Country/page.do?id=1041024&n1=3&...
Your link, on Egypt: "Amnesty International has long-standing concerns on systematic torture, deaths of prisoners in custody, unfair trials, arrests of prisoners of conscience for their political and religious beliefs or for their sexual orientation, wide use of administrative detention and long-term detention without trial and use of the death penalty. In addition, AI is concerned that armed opposition groups have renewed attacks on civilians after several years of quiet."
"The country has been in a State of Emergency since 1981, and despite minor reforms, State of Emergency legislation continues to give the government significant powers to use special courts, detain political prisoners and limit speech."
Failure to recognize the scale of abuse is tantamount to a sex educator saying condoms are pointless because everything they can help to prevent can still potentially happen with their use.
You've got to pick your battles. Persecution of those in the GLBT community is not going to stop in Egypt if we boycott holding Wikimania there because of it.
Yes, but it does have an impact to tell a community that many tens of thousands of U.S. dollars (or equivalent) will not come because of their country's human rights record. That money can go to a community that supports our values.
While it's possible to go and rank each country by some factor of abuses, it's more reasonable, and beneficial to the Wikimedia Foundation, to multiply out the common denominator (the worst possible cases notwithstanding). If anything, Egypt needs Wikimania to be there to facilitate the spread of information in order to counter these deeply rooted biases. If you really want to spread information somewhere, the best possible way is a physical presence.
How is an insular, primarily English-speaking convention going to do that?