There are about 100 times more page views than edits, sometimes even more. John
Gerard Meijssen skrev:
Hoi, A newspaper wants people to read. We want very much that readers consider the option to edit. The approach is therefore different. When I goto Wikipedia as a reader, I might be enabled to change my role and consequently get a different layout. Thanks, GerardM
2009/3/25 John at Darkstar vacuum@jeb.no
One additional note, in Norway a lot of the newspapers used a layout like Monobook (sort of) but has lately dismissed the solution in favor of radically much simpler designs. Especially the list of links in a left bar has been abandoned in favor of more directed approaches with horizontal menus in the top of the pages. Some of the newspapers has reported instantaneous increase in click rates.
It is thought provocative as most of the left bar is for wikipediams, and therefore is usable to only a small percentile of the total users (in page views). The rest of the users need navigational aids for the main space.
John
Hay (Husky) skrev:
Ten is a low number indeed, however, if those people are indeed 'typical users' instead of Wikipedians and you given them a few specific tasks (say, searching for an article on a topic they are interested in and editing it to add some information) you will probably encounter lots of problems soon enough.
On a different note: i'm not sure if this has been discussed before but will the usability study also take uploading media on Commons in account? Editing text is one thing, but adding media (and hence, using Commons) is almost as common and could also use *lots* of work on increasing usability.
-- Hay
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:55 AM, John at Darkstar vacuum@jeb.no
wrote:
Wikipedians should not be used to asses usabillity problems with Wikipedia, this is rule number one if you want to get information about why a newbie has problems with a system. A typical wikipedian is simply not a valid newbie. Ten participants are not nearly enough, they can only give you some clue about the real problem.
John
Naoko Komura skrev:
Howdy. (adding wikien-l folks to this thread. my apology for not including wikien-l with my initial email.)
The usability study has started today as scheduled. The usability team is monitoring the interviews and how ten test participants interact
with
Wikipedia when they are asked to edit an article at the lab facility in San Francisco today and tomorrow. The remote usability study on Thursday (March 26 PDT) will be done remotely, which means we recruit participants from Wikipedia through the site notice, and connect with them through web conferencing. Therefore the site notice for recruitment will appear again on Thursday. We expect to compile the results in a few weeks and the findings with you.
Naoko Komura Program Manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Naoko Komura wrote:
One of the important components of the usability initiative is to conduct multiple rounds of usability tests. The plan is to conduct at least three rounds of tests for qualitative usability evaluation over the span of twelve months, i) the initial evaluation, ii) the progress evaluation, and iii) the final evaluation. The initial usability test is scheduled on March 24, 25th and 26th. In-person lab tests are conducted in San Francisco at the first two days, and remote tests
will
be conducted on the third day.
As a preparation for the initial usability test, we incorporated the recruiting tool into English Wikipedia's site notice. You might have encountered site notice inviting for the participation. The target audience of testers are Wikipedia readers who have little or no experience in editing the Wikipedia articles. The banner is displayed within the range of 1:400 to 1:100 page views, and it will continue
till
early next week.
We look forward to learning from the usability tests and sharing the result with you.
Thanks.
Naoko ... on behalf of the usability team.
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l