On 06/05/07, Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/5/07, Casey Brown cbrown1023@comcast.net wrote:
A relevant Wikipedia policy is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:POINT
/me stabs No, this isn't what WP:POINT is about... WP:POINT would be if someone who argued against us breaking the law by hosting anti-circumvention devices on our site got tired of the arguments and went around adding child porn, windows license keys, and other contra-ban information to Wikipedia. I.e. "I'll prove your point is wrong by showing you the logical conclusions"
Greg is correct.
This is a perfect example of why WP:USING WP:CAPITALISED WP:GIBBERISH is problematic behaviour. If you'd referred to it by its full name - "Don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point" - it'd be obvious it didn't mean what you used "WP:POINT" to describe here.
- d.