At first, I agreed with Angela - protection is bad etc.
Then I read Aya's reasoning, and he has a point, doesn't he?
Wikiveristy has apparently failed to gain WM support, and hasn't exactly been flourishing.
Wikibooks is a project to collaboratively write free-content textbooks. To quote from What Wikibooks is not, which Angela restored this morning:
"Wikibooks is not a place for users to publish content unrelated to our main objective. In particular, Wikibooks may not be used as a personal homepage or online file storage. Users who want to use the wiki technology for other collaborative efforts should find a wiki hosting services such as [http://www.wikicities.com Wikicities], or install their own wiki software. For more information on how to set up the MediaWiki software, please read our book on [[Wiki Science]]."
So what possible justification is there for "Wikiversity" to freeload off Wikibooks?
Dan
___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com