Thomas Dalton,
Sure, but that can be done case-by-case. I think we both agree that sometimes it is better to use a language other than English.
And that should depend on which "native" language the project is in.
Best, H.
On 05/01/2008, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/01/2008, hillgentleman hillgentleman.wikiversity@gmail.com wrote:
Thomas Dalton,
The arguments from the parties, yes. I'm talking about discussion within the committee. Once they've heard the arguments they need to deliberate and reach a conclusion - that deliberation needs to happen in one language or it's simply impractical.
Then I might have misread your comment. Yes, that would be useful. That is up to the arbitrators and it is not something that we should bother ourselves with.
It needs to be decided before the committee is chosen, otherwise you run of the risk of someone that doesn't speak English getting on the committee but then not being able to take part in deliberations because they are all in English.
foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l