On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Russavia russavia.wikipedia@gmail.com wrote:
Yann,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Yann Forget yannfo@gmail.com wrote:
The rules of the project, "free license", or "in the public domain in USA and in the source country", are fine as long as they are not used to game the system.
Yann I totally agree with this.
The problem is, that the URAA RFC goes against that statement entirely by ignoring or turning a blind eye to the copyright status of files in the US.
Can you explain why there is the blaring discrepancy in your viewpoint here?
Cheers
Russvia
Can you explain why you think it's acceptable to substitute your judgment for the judgment of the Commons community? Evidently you don't argue the outcome of the RfC itself, so please enlighten us as to why your authority exceeds that of the very large number of participants in that discussion.