Trusting the stewards to opt-in what they judge to be a wiki with no community and taking this feature live on all wikis at once is not the same proposal. Both proposals make dealing with vandalism on inactive wikis easier, but my proposal prevents the problems that might occur with more active wikis due to poor communication.
Birgitte SB
____________________________________________________________________________________
Why can not we DEFINE a wiki with no community? For instance, either (a) no sysops; or (b) no edits by existing sysop(s) within the last month? These wikis would be opted-in authomatically, and others only if the community votes to opt-in. If the community is formed, the wiki can vote for opting out.
Cheers, Yaroslav