Florence Devouard wrote:
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
[snippage]
...is it possible that "experts" will ratify the selection of community trustees (accepting here implicitly that chapter recommended board appointed trustees are community trustees)?
It is not the responsibility of the nominating committee to appoint chapter representants. Period.
I was referring to the possibility that such experts as Stu West on the board, will have a veto on the final choices the chapters present to be appointed as trustees.
A full 4 of them, they are nominated and appointed before the chapters come up with their final suggestions for trusteeship.
There is nothing wrong in suggesting that the nominating committee might recommand the name of a person previously recommanded by chapters and refused by the board. I guess that would be a second rather serious red flag.
Or vice versa, I suppose (that is the chapters might suggest a name rejected either by the nominating committee itself, or a suggestion by the nomination committee vetoed by the board).
Yours,
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
The big question is as to whether chapters will come up with names before the 15th of october... Do you feel like leading the process to speed up the proposition of a procedure Jussi ?
I appreciate you will not have made such a suggestion lightly, so I will answer it with all seriousness. Before I make a full commitment, can you direct me to where the efforts on this are coördinated? I can only find the meta page, where there is very little activity visible.
Yours,
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen