*My boss (...) can't open the pregnancy article at work because the intro is NSFW our workplace.
I'm sorry but i don't find the problem in this article.
*I can't open the [[vagina]] article at work either, because of the really
in your face photo of a vagina when you open it up
The article is about vagina. The only picture there who might be "NSFW" is this one: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Azvag.jpg who only shows what are the anatomy of a vagina. I find very educational.
And BTW, if you don't want to see a vagina, don't open the article.
*who is totally grossed out by that photo on the vagina article,
gahhhhhhhhhhh, surely she can't be the only one!
No it was not. There are in fact a category in commons ( http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Vagina ) and in that category i found the image who replaced the Image you dislike so muchhttp://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Human_vulva_with_visible_vaginal_opening.jpg. But not because you don't like, because the one in the article now is more clear. _____ *Béria Lima* http://wikimedia.pt/(351) 925 171 484
*Imagine um mundo onde é dada a qualquer pessoa a possibilidade de ter livre acesso ao somatório de todo o conhecimento humano. É isso o que estamos a fazer http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Nossos_projetos.*
On 6 September 2011 15:15, Sarah Stierch sarah.stierch@gmail.com wrote:
Does your feminism excludes necessity for sexual education?
No, but, I can send you some pictures on Commons that have been "speedy keeps" of strippers with their legs spread wide because they are "educational and high quality."
My boss, who is bound to have a baby any day now, can't open the pregnancy article at work because the intro is NSFW our workplace. I can't open the [[vagina]] article at work either, because of the really in your face photo of a vagina when you open it up, however, I can totally read the intro to [[penis]] since there isn't a big giant penis in one's face upon opening it. I work in an educational environment (a museum institution, which has exhibits on sexuality, gender, etc) and I can't even look at these articles at work, take that as you will.
Sarah who is totally grossed out by that photo on the vagina article, gahhhhhhhhhhh, surely she can't be the only one!
-- GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for the Wikimedia Foundationhttp://www.glamwiki.org Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American Arthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch and Sarah Stierch Consulting
*Historical, cultural & artistic research & advising.*
http://www.sarahstierch.com/ _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l