Hi Gerard. I've addressed your question in my answer to MZ at the board board. Let me know if you need anything more. https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noti...
On Monday, 1 February 2016, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, Money would be spend for what ? When reliability is the big issue, the only issue, we would be Nupedia and not Wikipedia. Thanks, GerardM
On 31 January 2016 at 14:53, Anthony Cole <ahcoleecu@gmail.com javascript:;> wrote:
In the medicine, genetics and bioinformatics areas, there are a number of initiatives under way, mostly efforts to get experts engaged in editing
and
reviewing Wikimedia content, aimed at improving reliability. Would the board of trustees please consider formally recognising reliability as a serious problem on Wikimedia projects, and mandating the funds dissemination committee and the WMF to support realistic initiatives addressing reliability?
Input would be appreciated from board members and others interested at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard#Relia...
-- Anthony Cole _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org javascript:; Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org javascript:;
?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org javascript:; Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request@lists.wikimedia.org javascript:; ?subject=unsubscribe>